The Architectural Uprising, a collective movement founded in Sweden, is challenging the “uglification” of Nordic cities by modern designs, advocating a return to classic architectural aesthetics. With over 100,000 followers and branches in different countries, the group has significantly influenced building designs, forcing architects to revise and adapt to traditional styles. Their efforts have seen the transformation of several projects, reflecting public sentiment that buildings should be considered beautiful by those who live with them, not just experts. The group even runs annual polls to select their countries’ “ugliest” buildings, further illustrating their influence and reach.
Key Points:
- Rejection of Modern Design: The Architectural Uprising began as a reaction against what they view as discordant and unattractive modern architectural designs in Nordic cities. They argue for a return to traditional Scandinavian styles.
- Influence and Success: With over 100,000 followers, the group has successfully pushed architects to revise designs to align with traditional aesthetics. Projects like Sandakerveien 58 B/C in Oslo and the Risørholmen high-rises in Norway have been altered due to this pressure.
- Public Engagement: Architectural Uprising emphasizes that architecture should be appreciated by the general public, not just experts. They conduct public polls to identify the “ugliest” buildings, giving a voice to those who might otherwise be excluded from architectural discussions.
- Notable Projects Affected: The movement’s influence is evident in various projects across Norway, Sweden, and Finland. Examples include the Ekmansgatan 5, Upplands-Väsby neighborhood, and Skeppsbron riverside projects in Sweden, all reimagined to reflect traditional designs.
- Philosophical Stance: The underlying philosophy of Architectural Uprising is that what is built today should stand the test of time, be loved by the public, and be considered beautiful by everyday people, not just architectural experts. The movement asserts that everyone is entitled to have opinions and feelings about architecture.
